1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1953 Porsche 1300
To start off, 1962 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Porsche 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Porsche 1300 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1953 Porsche 1300.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Porsche 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Porsche 1300. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Porsche 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 1953 Porsche 1300 | |
| Make | Jeep | Porsche |
| Model | CJ5 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2110 mm |
