1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 1962 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1959 Volvo 120.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Volvo 120. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ5 | 120 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |