1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 1963 Lotus 25 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 574 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ5 | 25 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 456 kg |
