1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1964 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1964 Morris Oxford is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1964 Morris Oxford. (39 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Morris Oxford weights approximately 96 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Morris Oxford. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Oxford. (81 Nm). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 1964 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Jeep | Morris |
| Model | CJ5 | Oxford |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1126 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |
