1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1999 Lada 110
To start off, 1999 Lada 110 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lada 110 (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1999 Lada 110.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Lada 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lada 110. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 1999 Lada 110 | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ5 | 110 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1026 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |