1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (141 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 346 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Saturn L. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (203 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2004 Saturn L | |
| Make | Jeep | Saturn |
| Model | CJ5 | L |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1376 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |
