1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2006 Opel Corsa is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Corsa (90 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Corsa should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Opel Corsa.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Opel Corsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Corsa. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | CJ5 | Corsa |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |