1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Transporter
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,460 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Transporter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter (172 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volkswagen Transporter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Transporter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Volkswagen Transporter | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | CJ5 | Transporter |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3010 mm |