1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1962 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | CJ5 | Caprice |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |