1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ5 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2685 mm |
