1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2011 BMW 323
To start off, 2011 BMW 323 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 323 (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2011 BMW 323 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | CJ5 | 323 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2770 mm |