1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 891 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1962 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ5 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2748 mm |