1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. Both 1962 Jeep CJ5 and 2012 Honda Accord are equipped with a 2,199 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Accord (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Accord (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5. 2012 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 1962 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Honda Accord | |
| Make | Jeep | Honda |
| Model | CJ5 | Accord |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
