1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Acura TL
To start off, 2013 Acura TL is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Acura TL weights approximately 770 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Acura TL (370 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Acura TL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | CJ5 | TL |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2118 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1452 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2775 mm |