1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 154 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo has automatic transmission and 1962 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Jeep | Lamborghini |
| Model | CJ5 | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4345 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2560 mm |
