1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 946 kg more than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Jeep | Triumph |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 954 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2110 mm |
