1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1997 Mercury Villager is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 100 kg more than 1997 Mercury Villager.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercury |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Villager |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4980 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
