1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 500 kg more than 2002 Rover 75.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | 75 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4980 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |