1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 374 kg more than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Armada |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4980 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3140 mm |
