1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | 3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4980 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2650 mm |