1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2006 Smart Roadster

To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 935 kg more than 2006 Smart Roadster.

Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer 2006 Smart Roadster
Make Jeep Smart
Model Grand Wagoneer Roadster
Year Released 1962 2006
Body Type SUV Roadster
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 5898 cc 696 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 100 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1900 kg 965 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3430 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2370 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]