1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 420 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4980 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3010 mm |
