1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Galant

To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Galant.

Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mitsubishi Galant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer 2009 Mitsubishi Galant
Make Jeep Mitsubishi
Model Grand Wagoneer Galant
Year Released 1962 2009
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5898 cc 2399 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 158 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Weight 1900 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4860 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]