1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2011 Ford F-450
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 769 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2011 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | F-450 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4980 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 1085 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2438 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 2024 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 4379 mm |