1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Epica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
