1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C (203 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C (500 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2011 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | C |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4980 cc | 2143 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 203 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3450 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4606 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1459 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
