1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | Epica |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4980 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 316 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |