1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 220 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Jeep | Aston Martin |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Vantage |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4385 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2022 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2601 mm |
