1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 420 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |
