1962 Jensen 541 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jensen 541. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jensen 541 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jensen 541 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 130 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jensen 541 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jensen 541 (310 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Jensen 541 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jensen 541 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jensen | Triumph |
| Model | 541 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
