1962 Lancia Appia vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Appia. (52 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 320 kg more than 1962 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lancia Appia. (87 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lancia Appia. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has automatic transmission and 1962 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1962 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lancia Appia | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Lancia | Daewoo |
| Model | Appia | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1761 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
