1962 Lancia Appia vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Scion xB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Scion xB (108 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Appia. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Scion xB weights approximately 210 kg more than 1962 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Scion xB (142 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lancia Appia. (77 Nm). This means 2004 Scion xB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lancia Appia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lancia Appia | 2004 Scion xB | |
| Make | Lancia | Scion |
| Model | Appia | xB |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 45 L |
