1962 Lancia Appia vs. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser (240 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Appia. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 781 kg more than 1962 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lancia Appia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser (376 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lancia Appia. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lancia Appia. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser has automatic transmission and 1962 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1962 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Appia | 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Appia | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 180 L |