1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2003 Opel Combo
To start off, 2003 Opel Combo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Combo weights approximately 85 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lancia Flavia | 2003 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Lancia | Opel |
| Model | Flavia | Combo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 52 L |
