1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2004 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Musso is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2004 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Flavia | 2004 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Lancia | SsangYong |
Model | Flavia | Musso |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 80 L |