1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Flavia | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Lancia | Land Rover |
Model | Flavia | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 283 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 100 L |