1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 208 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Flavia | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Flavia | B2300 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 62 L |