1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Flavia | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Lancia | Jaguar |
Model | Flavia | XF |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |