1962 Lancia Flavia vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 716 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lancia Flavia | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Flavia | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |