1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4690 mm |