1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (276 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 708 kg more than 2000 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (378 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
Model | Continental | Mark II |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 630 Nm | 378 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |