1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 810 kg more than 2003 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Lincoln | Honda |
Model | Continental | CR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 630 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 58 L |