1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 2003 Honda Integra
To start off, 2003 Honda Integra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2003 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2003 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 2003 Honda Integra | |
Make | Lincoln | Honda |
Model | Continental | Integra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |