1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1962 Lincoln Continental. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1962 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 1962 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | UTE |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |