1962 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 569 kg more than 2010 Volvo S80.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo S80. (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Continental | S80 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7043 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 67 L |