1962 Lotus Elan vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 323 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elan | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | 323 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2320 mm |
