1962 Lotus Elan vs. 1998 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1998 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 ZAZ Wagon weights approximately 155 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elan | 1998 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Lotus | ZAZ |
Model | Elan | Wagon |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2330 mm |