1962 Lotus Elan vs. 1999 Toyota Vitz
To start off, 1999 Toyota Vitz is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. Both 1962 Lotus Elan and 1999 Toyota Vitz are equipped with a 1,496 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Vitz (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Vitz should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Vitz weights approximately 325 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Vitz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota Vitz (143 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota Vitz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elan | 1999 Toyota Vitz | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Vitz |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |