1962 Lotus Elan vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue

To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,597 cc, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue weights approximately 950 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.

Because 1962 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue (181 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue has automatic transmission and 1962 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1962 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Version Longue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: