1962 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 916 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Lotus Elan | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |
